ARCHIVE UPDATE No 22 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SNELLS PARK |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
POTTERIES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shortly before potmaking ceased at Samuel South & Sons in October 1960, Peter South climbed the access scaffolding onto the roof of the three storey warehouse office under construction on the neighbouring site of the E G Cole pottery that had been sold some three years earlier for development. Peter photographed the Potteries from this unique "birds-eye" vantage point. Two of the photographs are reproduced below and further selections will appear in future editions of the Update.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SAMUEL SOUTH(1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There has been the opportunity to carry out an initial study of the Bank passbook of Samuel(1) mentioned in Update No 10. The account was held with the London & Provincial Bank Ltd, later absorbed by Barclays, and the passbook, similar to a bank statement, records each deposit made (amount only) and each cheque drawn (amount and payee) for the period June 1886 - Sept 1892. All but 9 of the 360 deposit entries are for cash receipts thus demonstrating the need for the protection employed by Samuel(2) when collecting monies due from customers and described in Update No 13. At present, the date of the move of the pottery from Dysons Road to White Hart Lane, suggested as 1886, has been unsubstantiated. There has been a gap between the 1881 census and the 1888 rating valuation at which time Samuel(1) is shown as occupying the "brick ground" and house (Tentdale) in White Hart Lane. The passbook lends support that the 1886 date is correct because:
Accepting 1886 as the date that the business moved to White Hart Lane and that the receipts are the proceeds of the business then there was a dramatic three-fold increase in turnover between 1887 - 1892 (projected) as shown in the following table:
The results are even more impressive when considering that Sankey withdrew because he was unable to make the Pottery a paying proposition. The income was likely to have been more than recorded because cash received could be used to pay bills without passing through the account. The investment of £22-5s-0d (1998-£930) by Samuel(1) when he bought the Dysons Road pottery from his father, Joseph(1), in 1874 was proving a success. (1998 equivalent using "Value of the Pound version 2.0" Drake Software Associates)
KLB 2/00 |